SmugMug > keywords > passing > Running in my hamster wheel photo
SmugMug > keywords > passing > Nov. 23, 09

Passing by...
SmugMug > keywords > passing > More traffic... I blurred this pic on purpose to make the traffic my focus...
SmugMug > keywords > passing > Just Passing Thru detail

What is abnormal?
Anything that is not normal. Therein lies the difficulty. What may be normal in one country may well be abnormal in another. Who or what defines normal. As an idea it is infinite in both directions. 

Probably the best way to come to grips with the normal/abnormal nexus you would have to consult Michel Foucault's 'Lectures at the College de France' (1974-75). This feed has all the info: www.michel-foucault.com.

For instance would a normal person believe that they are sewn into an incredible matrix that lies within an eternal staircase (in both directions) of tesselated matrices. Probably not...

Would the normal person believe that these matrices spin PHI to eternity as well, in perfected mandalas of the Julia set as clearly shown by Benoit Mandelbrot. Time to lock the silly bugger up...

And if i told you that the Schumann Resonance is changing (rather quickly) in line with the Waitaha, Mayan and Hopi predictions, coming to 13:00:00:00, and the dawn of a new convenant with God. Fair enough, hang him...

And what about this: With the syzygy [planetary alignment] of galactic centre/sun/earth/29 degrees Sagittarius things will get better for Planet Earth.

'There's no money in that for me, burn his remains and flush them down the toilet'.
SmugMug > keywords > passing > Third-phase Entanglement

detail from 'Just Passing Through' by inanga, photo by mfnw

The best public feed for this subject is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography. i daresay there are many more advanced feeds but the urls would been well and truly 'firewalled' by all sorts of spyware. i'll explain it as best i can, but if i seem out of my depth then get a copy of 'Entanglement: the Greatest Mystery in Physics' by Amir D. Acael [ed: details later. The first patent that i 'in tu it' that seems to be 'on to it' is http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090022322]

'...atoms, molecules, neutrons, protons, electrons, quarks as well as photons - the basic units of light.

Entering this strange new world of the very small is an experience as baffling and bizarre as Alice's adventures in Wonderland'.

Preface to 'Entanglement'

'Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection'.

Albert Einstein

[Ed note: just watched a great You-Tube clip of a guy imitating Brandon Flowers - check it out. The Killers are one of the 'great' bands - yeah! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiucFyVcmY8 'Are we human or are we dancer?']

Anyway, the patent above hit the nail on the head, so to speak. It mentioned the magic words 'second harmonic generation' and 'spontaneous parametric down-conversion'.

'Entanglement' - the kind of marriages some of us get ourselves into at times!

Two particles that might be miles apart - millions or billions of miles - are mysteriously linked together. Whatever happens to one of them causes a change to the other one.

Entangled entities (particles or photons) are linked together because they were produced by some process that bound them together in a special way.

For example, two photons emitted from the same atom as one of its electrons descends down two energy levels are 'entangled'. (Energy levels are associated with the orbit of an electron in the atom.) While neither flies off in a definite direction, the pair will always be found on opposite sides of the atom. And such photons or particles, produced in a way that links them together, remain intertwined forever. Once one is changed, its twin - WHEREVER IT MAY BE IN THE UNIVERSE - WILL CHANGE INSTANTANEOUSLY.

Erwin Schrodinger stated:

'Entanglement is not 'one' but rather THE characteristic trait of quantum mechanics'.

Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion (SPDC) - this is simply an explanation. i will endeavour to weave all this together. All i'll say here is the FTL ('faster than light') is a reality, and this leaves 'energy [E] = mass [m] x the speed of light [c] squared' a little Ong's 'Old' Hat.

[Ed note: consulting notes on second harmonic generation and how it relates to the crystals extant in the pineal 'third eye' inanga]

Inn SPDC each photon that does not go straight through the calcite crystal [in experiments] breaks down into two photons. Each such photon somehow interacts with the crystal lattice, in a way that is not completely understood by science, and this interaction gives rise to a pair of photons.

When the photon undergoes this transformation, the sum of the frequencies of the two resulting photons is equal to the frequency of the original photon. The photons in a pair produced in this way are 'entangled'.

Nick Herbert, a true quantum physicist could describe all this easier than me - check him out:
SmugMug > keywords > passing > If motorbikes and Vietnam aren't synonymous with each other, then they certainly should be.

Location: Cat Ba town, Vietnam

Lens used: 24-105mm f4.0 IS
SmugMug > keywords > passing > Just Passing Through Scroll (Detail 1)

acrylic, gouache, oil, glitter, collage (Scientific American article, Mozart music score, etc) on paper

300mm x 1400mm (painted one side)

Irreversibility is a key concept, Prigogine believes. Just as certain chemicals, when mixed together, can never 'unmix' into their original molecular structures, the universe and what it contains, says Prigogine, are irreversible. 'You cannot reverse the evolution of the universe', he says, 'even theoretically. And you cannot predict its future, except in terms of scenarios that depend on a never-ending series of...crossroads in the chain of causality.' Prigogine's theory of open dissipative structures encompasses human social behaviour, chemical reactions, and ecosystems: things whose structures are maintained by continuous flows of energy permeating them. And energy flow, Prigogine observes, may become so complex that it causes fluctuations too great for the system to absorb, thus forcing it to reorganize. But each reorganization produces greater complexity and greater likelihood of random fluctuations. The result: more instability, more reorganization; in other words, a quickened creation of living matter into new structures. Evolution.

Robert B Tucker, Interview with Ilya Prigogine (The Nobel Prize Winner for Chemistry - 1977), May 1983

inanga
SmugMug > keywords > passing > Running in my hamster wheel photo
SmugMug > keywords > passing > Running in my hamster wheel photo
Running in my hamster wheel photo
Photo by: TheMacabreArt • see photo in gallery

Comments

|

New comment:

Name: Email: Link:


To foil spammers, enter this code: copy this text in this box: Code unreadable?