I'd agree, bad photo, but it was taken from a very long distance with a Canon SX50. It's good enough that I could get the information from the tail number and know who this Cessna 172S belongs to. I've heard of trainspotting, but the SX50 allows for plane spotting.
I'd agree, bad photo, but it was taken from a very long distance with a Canon SX50. It's good enough that I could get the information from the tail number and know who this Cessna 172S belongs to. I've heard of trainspotting, but the SX50 allows for plane spotting.
Canon SX50. It's good enough that I could get the information from the tail number and know who this Cessna 172S belongs to. I've heard of trainspotting, but the SX50 allows for plane spotting." href="javascript:openLB(2381031571,'',XLarge,'',1024,768);">I'd agree, bad photo, but it was taken from a very long distance with a Canon SX50. It's good enough that I could get the information from the tail number and know who this Cessna 172S belongs to. I've heard of trainspotting, but the SX50 allows for plane spotting.
I'd agree, bad photo, but it was taken from a very long distance with a Canon SX50. It's good enough that I could get the information from the tail number and know who this Cessna 172S belongs to. I've heard of trainspotting, but the SX50 allows for plane spotting.
See photo in original gallery.