keyword pages: 1  2  3  4  >  
< 1 of 29 >
SmugMug > today's keyword > panorama > Work Photos Nov. 2009 photo
SmugMug > today's keyword > panorama > Work Photos Nov. 2009 photo
SmugMug > today's keyword > panorama > The large 10.0 megapixel sensor provides enough resolution to fill a 23-inch Apple Cinema Display with deep vibrant hues. This relatively large sensor is housed in a pleasing black body that has an almost miraculous ability to resist fingerprints. Capturing images at the largest JPEG setting, 3648 x 2736 pixels, has provided more than ample data for current needs. If greater data latitude is ever required, the Canon S90 has RAW capability available. The 10 megapixel images have proven detailed enough for stitched panoramas of Victoria Harbor at dusk. The series of images needed to compose the panorama to the above were taken from a slightly swaying ship. The image stabilization helped a good deal and works well in all conditions tested. An unseen obstacle is humidity, and it was a battle in both Hong Kong and Vietnam. The air was thick and the scene was perfect as the door to the ship's deck opened. As the unconditioned air ensconce the Canon S90's lens, which had been air conditioned for hours, the lens fogged up and created a neat mist effect on some images. The S90's lens handled this moisture well and autofocus continued to work. Once dried off, the lens had a streak-free shine.
SmugMug > today's keyword > panorama > Work Photos Nov. 2009 photo
SmugMug > today's keyword > panorama > Work Photos Nov. 2009 photo
SmugMug > today's keyword > panorama > Work Photos Nov. 2009 photo
SmugMug > today's keyword > panorama > Work Photos Nov. 2009 photo
SmugMug > today's keyword > panorama > Work Photos Nov. 2009 photo
SmugMug > today's keyword > panorama > Work Photos Nov. 2009 photo
Work Photos Nov. 2009 photo
Photo by: Warren • see photo in gallery
keyword pages: 1  2  3  4  >  
< 1 of 29 >

Comments

|

New comment:

Name: Email: Link:


To foil spammers, enter this code: copy this text in this box: Code unreadable?